Ban Notes - ADMINS ONLY

Nikita wrote:

snowman wrote: Sure, Nik. If you have a problem with that. He stays banned

I only wanted to play with him so I can know him better.

Well, let's make it clear and explaining my position :

If i'm not wrong, lifting the ban of a player is a prerogative of the admin who banned it. When an admin decides to ban a player, he explains it in a report and he mentions the duration of ban. When it's time, he or also any other admin can lift the ban. That's the way things work since a long time and it's fine for me. Leonidas case is particular, it's a permanent ban that already has been the subject of discussions here. In such a case, and regardless of consideration about the reason of the ban, i'm not fundamentaly against a "one more" chance but the point is, i say again, that the decision must be the object of a prealable discussion by all admins and must be submitted to a vote.

I 100% in favour of more discussions regarding important decisions.
I'm also 100% certain Snowman did that with the best intentions in mind.
Let's work together for a better community

No worries, i'm also pretty sure that Snow's intentions were not to make an unilateral decision in his own corner irrespective of the other admins.

Let's look at the bright side, this case tends to show that, for similar future situations, we maybe have to se up a process for dedicated discussions and preliminary vote.

Unbanned "The Trooper" as his ban has expired.

Lol I almost forgot that screenshot
In South Italy we say "to you and to your family too" if someone says us "merry Christmas" or "happy Easter"